National Accident Society v. Spiro

164 U.S. 281, 17 S. Ct. 996, 41 L. Ed. 435, 1896 U.S. LEXIS 1859
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 30, 1896·No. 460·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

The Chief Justice :

This is a certificate from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth- Circuit, propounding, after a preliminary statement, the following question:

“ Does a defendant by filing a petition in a state court for removal of the cause to the United States court, in general terms, unaccompanied by a plea in abatement, and without specifying or restricting the purpose of his appearance, thereby waive objection to the jurisdiction of the court for' want of' sufficient service of the summons ? ”

For the reasons given and on the authorities cited in the case of Wabash Western Railway v. Brow, ante, 271, the question must be answered in the negative.

Certificate accordingly.

Mr. Justice Brewer and Mr. Justice Peokham dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Accident Society v. Spiro, 164 U.S. 281, 17 S. Ct. 996, 41 L. Ed. 435, 1896 U.S. LEXIS 1859 (1896).

164 U.S. 281 (National Accident Society v. Spiro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Longview v. First Nat. Bank
152 F.2d 97 (Fifth Circuit, 1945)
First Nat. Bank v. Louisiana Tax Commission
143 So. 23 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1932)
Horton v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad
78 S.E. 494 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1913)
Murphy v. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co.
184 F. 495 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada, 1911)
Paul v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
69 N.E. 1024 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1904)
Baker v. Union Stock Yards National Bank
89 N.W. 269 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1902)
Hawkins v. Peirce
79 F. 452 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana, 1897)
National Acc. Soc. v. Spiro
78 F. 774 (Sixth Circuit, 1897)
Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Simmons
165 U.S. 27 (Supreme Court, 1897)