National Abortion Federation v. Gonzales

489 F.3d 125, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9886, 2007 WL 1238861
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 25, 2007·No. No. 04-5201-CV·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

ORDER

JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Circuit Judge.

By order dated March 7, 2006, this court stayed further briefing on the issue of remedy pending the decision by the Supreme Court in Gonzales v. Carhart. On April 18, 2007, the Supreme Court rendered its decision in Carhart, — U.S. —, 127 S.Ct. 1610, 167 L.Ed.2d 480 (2007). Following our usual practice of allowing the parties to present their views following a relevant Supreme Court decision, see, e.g., Muhammad v. City of N.Y. Dep’t of Corr., 126 F.3d 119, 122 (2d Cir.1997); United States v. Vasquez, 85 F.3d 59, 60 (2d Cir.1996), we offer the parties the opportunity to comment on the effect of Carhart on this appeal.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall file, within 14 days, letter briefs, not to exceed ten double-spaced pages, setting forth their views on the appropriate disposition of the appeal. The judgment of the district court is STAYED forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Abortion Federation v. Gonzales, 489 F.3d 125, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9886, 2007 WL 1238861 (2d Cir. 2007).

489 F.3d 125 (National Abortion Federation v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Abortion Federation v. Gonzales
489 F.3d 125 (Second Circuit, 2007)