Nation-Wide Check Corp. v. Sherman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Nation-Wide Check Corp. v. Sherman

299 A.2d 10, 268 Md. 1, 1973 Md. LEXIS 1082

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedJanuary 17, 1973

DocketNo. 159

StatusPublished

This text of 299 A.2d 10 (Nation-Wide Check Corp. v. Sherman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nation-Wide Check Corp. v. Sherman, 299 A.2d 10, 268 Md. 1, 1973 Md. LEXIS 1082 (Md. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

Closer study by counsel for the parties of the Maryland Rules, closer adherence to the forms appearing in the appendix to those rules, and answers to interrogatories in accordance with the time schedule set in those rules would have avoided the necessity for this opinion.

[2]*2This case reaches us by way of appeal by the plaintiff from “judgment by default” entered against it because of its failure to answer interrogatories propounded by the defendant, despite a substantial lapse of time. There can be no judgment by default against a plaintiff. The sanction provided under Maryland Rule 417 d properly applicable to the plaintiff-appellant here was for the trial court to “dismiss the action.” In other words, to enter a judgment of non pros. See 2 Poe, Pleading & Practice §§ 362 and 365, at 348-351 (5th ed. Tiffany 1925). Entry of “judgment by default” was a nullity. The interests of justice dictate prompt trial on the merits upon the remand.

Order vacated and case remanded for trial; appellant to pay the costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

Closer study by counsel for the parties of the Maryland Rules, closer adherence to the forms appearing in the appendix to those rules, and answers to interrogatories in accordance with the time schedule set in those rules would have avoided the necessity for this opinion.

[2]*2This case reaches us by way of appeal by the plaintiff from “judgment by default” entered against it because of its failure to answer interrogatories propounded by the defendant, despite a substantial lapse of time. There can be no judgment by default against a plaintiff. The sanction provided under Maryland Rule 417 d properly applicable to the plaintiff-appellant here was for the trial court to “dismiss the action.” In other words, to enter a judgment of non pros. See 2 Poe, Pleading & Practice §§ 362 and 365, at 348-351 (5th ed. Tiffany 1925). Entry of “judgment by default” was a nullity. The interests of justice dictate prompt trial on the merits upon the remand.

Order vacated and case remanded for trial; appellant to pay the costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

299 A.2d 10, 268 Md. 1, 1973 Md. LEXIS 1082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nation-wide-check-corp-v-sherman-md-1973.