Nation v. Moore

District Court, W.D. Missouri·Decided August 12, 2024·No. 3:22-cv-05063·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION

JILL NATION,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 3:22 cv 5063 - MDH

THOMAS E. MOORE, DDS, and ROCK DENTAL MISSOURI, LLC,

Defendants.

ORDER STRIKING PUNITIVE DAMAGES

A federal court sitting in diversity applies state substantive and federal procedural law. Miller v. Honkamp Krueger Fin. Servs., Inc., 9 F.4th 1011, 1016 (8th Cir. 2021). If an item of special damage is claimed, it must be specifically stated. Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(g). Conduct that is outrageous because of the defendant’s evil motive or reckless indifference to the rights of others may warrant punitive damages. Burnett v. Griffith, 769 S.W.2d 780, 787 (Mo. Banc (1989)). Plaintiff’s amended complaint (Doc. 36) however makes no specified mention or a request for punitive damages as procedurally required under federal law. Further, Plaintiff has not set within their amended complaint any allegations that Defendants acted with evil motive or demonstrated reckless indifference regarding any of the claims alleged as substantially required under state law. CONCLUSION Therefore, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff’s request to seek punitive damages at trial. An award of punitive damages will not be an issue in trial of this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 12, 2024 /s/ Douglas Harpool DOUGLAS HARPOOL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nation v. Moore, (W.D. Mo. 2024).

Nation v. Moore (Nation v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burnett v. Griffith
769 S.W.2d 780 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1989)
Cara Miller v. Honkamp Krueger Financial
9 F.4th 1011 (Eighth Circuit, 2021)