Nation v. Lee

334 S.E.2d 160, 254 Ga. 726, 1985 Ga. LEXIS 898
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 5, 1985
Docket42345
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 334 S.E.2d 160 (Nation v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nation v. Lee, 334 S.E.2d 160, 254 Ga. 726, 1985 Ga. LEXIS 898 (Ga. 1985).

Opinion

Smith, Justice.

A Douglas County jury convicted appellant, Shirley Nation, of shoplifting. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Nation v. State, 172 Ga. App. 354 (323 SE2d 181) (1984). Appellant subsequently applied for a writ of habeas corpus. We granted her application for a certificate of probable cause to appeal the habeas court’s denial of her application for writ of habeas corpus.

The habeas court did not include findings of fact or conclusions of law in its initial order denying the writ. Pursuant to an order of this court, the habeas court complied with OCGA § 9-24-49 by supplementing its order with findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Appellant contends that, notwithstanding the habeas court’s belated compliance with OCGA § 9-24-49, the habeas court erred in finding that the trial court did not violate her constitutional rights through the maintenance of a policy of mandatory sentencing in shoplifting cases. She asserts that the trial court should have considered the fact that she had never been convicted of a crime before, the testimony by numerous character witnesses, and the circumstances of the crime before sentencing her to thirty days imprisonment.

However harsh such a sentence may seem, we do not reach the question of whether a mandatory sentencing policy would be unconstitutional, as appellant has not established the fact that the trial court has pursued a policy of sentencing every person convicted of shoplifting to a period of incarceration. We therefore affirm the habeas court’s ruling, pursuant to the amendment of its order.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nation v. State of Georgia
645 F. Supp. 179 (N.D. Georgia, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
334 S.E.2d 160, 254 Ga. 726, 1985 Ga. LEXIS 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nation-v-lee-ga-1985.