Natiional Labor Relations Board v. Pay Less Drug Store of Pendleton, Inc.

Ninth Circuit

Natiional Labor Relations Board v. Pay Less Drug Store of Pendleton, Inc.

492 F.2d 1382

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 29, 1974

Docket73-2268

StatusPublished

This text of 492 F.2d 1382 (Natiional Labor Relations Board v. Pay Less Drug Store of Pendleton, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Natiional Labor Relations Board v. Pay Less Drug Store of Pendleton, Inc., 492 F.2d 1382 (9th Cir. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The petitioning Board’s Decision and Order is reported at 203 NLRB No. 10. The Board’s Order was based upon its conclusion that the respondent had violated section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act by refusing to bargain with the certified representative of the respondent’s employees. The reason for the respondent’s refusal was its view that the election of the bargaining representative was invalid and that the Board therefore acted improperly in certifying the particular union as the statutory bargaining representative. The respondent leveled six objections to the conduct of the election, all of which were overruled after having been considered by a Hearing Officer and the Board. We are not persuaded that the Board’s resolution of the objections, which principally involved factual issues, were not supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, the Board’s Order will be

Enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The petitioning Board’s Decision and Order is reported at 203 NLRB No. 10. The Board’s Order was based upon its conclusion that the respondent had violated section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act by refusing to bargain with the certified representative of the respondent’s employees. The reason for the respondent’s refusal was its view that the election of the bargaining representative was invalid and that the Board therefore acted improperly in certifying the particular union as the statutory bargaining representative. The respondent leveled six objections to the conduct of the election, all of which were overruled after having been considered by a Hearing Officer and the Board. We are not persuaded that the Board’s resolution of the objections, which principally involved factual issues, were not supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, the Board’s Order will be

Enforced.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

492 F.2d 1382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/natiional-labor-relations-board-v-pay-less-drug-store-of-pendleton-inc-ca9-1974.