Nathaniel Wilbanks v. State of Florida
This text of Nathaniel Wilbanks v. State of Florida (Nathaniel Wilbanks v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D18-4613 _____________________________
NATHANIEL WILBANKS,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.
March 15, 2019
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).
ROBERTS, RAY, and JAY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Nathaniel Wilbanks, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nathaniel Wilbanks v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nathaniel-wilbanks-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.