Nathaniel Weibel v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided July 6, 2021·No. 20-1832·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 20-1832

Nathaniel Johnross Weibel

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

United States of America

Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Western

Submitted: April 16, 2021 Filed: July 6, 2021

[Unpublished]

Before LOKEN, WOLLMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Nathaniel Weibel pleaded guilty to attempted enticement of a minor using the internet and received 300 months in prison. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422(b), 2427. In a motion to vacate brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, he claimed that his attorney was ineffective for failing to file a notice of appeal. After finding that the attorney

testified credibly at an evidentiary hearing and that Weibel did not, the district court 1 denied relief.

Key to the district court’s decision was the attorney’s testimony, consistent with his handwritten notes, that Weibel never instructed him to file an appeal. Weibel was adamant that he had done so, but the court viewed his testimony as “convenient, self-serving[,] and generally not candid.” With credibility findings like these “virtually unreviewable on appeal,” Kidd v. Norman, 651 F.3d 947, 952 n.5 (8th Cir. 2011), we cannot say that anything in this record “le[aves] [us] with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed,” Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 573 (1985) (quotation marks omitted); see United States v. Luke, 686 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2012) (subjecting these types of findings to clear-error review).

We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court.

1 The Honorable Jeffrey L. Viken, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Daneta Wollmann, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of South Dakota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nathaniel Weibel v. United States, (8th Cir. 2021).

Nathaniel Weibel v. United States (Nathaniel Weibel v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anderson v. City of Bessemer City
470 U.S. 564 (Supreme Court, 1985)
Kidd v. Norman
651 F.3d 947 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)
Marty Luke v. United States
686 F.3d 600 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)