Nathaniel Norris v. State
This text of Nathaniel Norris v. State (Nathaniel Norris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-16-00154-CR
NATHANIEL NORRIS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 76th District Court Morris County, Texas Trial Court No. 11,425CR
Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess MEMORANDUM OPINION Nathaniel Norris was convicted by a jury of aggravated sexual assault of a child and
sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. On appeal, Norris argues that the trial court erred (1) in
admitting allegedly unauthenticated Facebook Messenger texts sent by cell phone and (2) in
assessing court costs in this case, and all companion cases, even though they were consolidated
for trial.1
We addressed these issues in detail in our opinion of this date on Norris’ appeal in cause
number 06-16-00150-CR. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude that the trial court
did not abuse its discretion in overruling Norris’ objection of improper authentication in this case,
and further find that Norris’ second issue is moot.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Ralph K. Burgess Justice Date Submitted: April 21, 2017 Date Decided: April 27, 2017
Do Not Publish
1 Norris also appeals one conviction of indecency with a child entered in companion cause number 06-16-00150-CR, and three convictions of sexual assault of a child entered in companion cause numbers 06-16-00151-CR, 06-16-00152- CR, and 06-16-00153-CR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nathaniel Norris v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nathaniel-norris-v-state-texapp-2017.