Nathaniel Knox v. State
This text of Nathaniel Knox v. State (Nathaniel Knox v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1709
NATHANIEL KNOX,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA CUMBERLAND COUNTY TRANSPORTATION; MAJESTIC LUXURY TOURS, INCORPORATED; RUDY; UNKNOWN NAME DRIVER AND HELPER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:11-cv-00107-BO)
Submitted: November 17, 2011 Decided: November 22, 2011
Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathaniel Knox, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Knox appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
The denial of in forma pauperis status is immediately
appealable. Roberts v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 339 U.S. 844, 845 (1950)
(per curiam). We have reviewed the record and conclude the
appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed
in forma pauperis on appeal and affirm the order denying pauper
status for the reasons stated by the district court. See Knox
v. North Carolina, No. 5:11-cv-00107-BO (E.D.N.C. June 9, 2011).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nathaniel Knox v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nathaniel-knox-v-state-ca4-2011.