Nathaniel Jones v. Petersburg City Jail
This text of 979 F.2d 847 (Nathaniel Jones v. Petersburg City Jail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Nathaniel JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PETERSBURG CITY JAIL, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 92-7005.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 26, 1992
Decided: November 17, 1992
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Nathaniel Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Jones appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) without prejudice to Jones's right to refile naming the proper people as Defendants. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Petersburg City Jail, No. CA-92-689-N (E.D. Va. Aug. 28, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
979 F.2d 847, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 35171, 1992 WL 337083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nathaniel-jones-v-petersburg-city-jail-ca4-1992.