Nathaniel Isaac v. Kenneth Taylor, Warden, Eastern Correctional Institution Attorney General of the State of Maryland

17 F.3d 1434, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12216, 1994 WL 66020
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 2, 1994
Docket93-6810
StatusPublished

This text of 17 F.3d 1434 (Nathaniel Isaac v. Kenneth Taylor, Warden, Eastern Correctional Institution Attorney General of the State of Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nathaniel Isaac v. Kenneth Taylor, Warden, Eastern Correctional Institution Attorney General of the State of Maryland, 17 F.3d 1434, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12216, 1994 WL 66020 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

17 F.3d 1434
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Nathaniel ISAAC, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Kenneth TAYLOR, Warden, Eastern Correctional Institution;
Attorney General of the State of Maryland,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 93-6810.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 25, 1994.
Decided March 2, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-92-2632-JFM)

Nathaniel Isaac, appellant pro se.

John Joseph Curran, Atty. Gen., George Albert Eichhorn, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baltimore, MD, for appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Isaac v. Taylor, No. CA-92-2632-JFM (D. Md. July 15 and 26, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 F.3d 1434, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12216, 1994 WL 66020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nathaniel-isaac-v-kenneth-taylor-warden-eastern-co-ca4-1994.