Nathaniel Frazier, Jr. AKA Nathaniel J. Frazier v. State

Opinion

May 26, 2015 / RECEIVED \

NO. 03-14-00655-CR WZtm kTHIROCOURJOFAPPEALS

\ JEFFREY DKYI F •

NATHANIEL J. FRAZIER, JR. § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS §

VS. § THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT §

STATE OF TEXAS § SITTING AT AUSTIN, TEXAS

PRO SE MOTION FOR ACCESS TO APPELLATE RECORD To The Honorable Justices of the Third Court of Appeals, Now Comes Nathaniel J. Frazier, Jr., in the above styled and numbered cause, and moves this Court to grant him access to the appellate record in this matter, and for good cause shows the following:

I.

Attorney Justin S. Mock was appointed by the trial court to represent Nathaniel J. Frazier, Jr. in the appeal of his conviction and sentence in Trial Cause No. D-13-

00958-SA rendered in the 391st Judicial District Court ofTom Green County, Texas on July 15, 2014.

II.

Counsel for Nathaniel J. Frazier, Jr. prepared and filed an "Anders Brief on behalf of Appellant and a Motion to Withdraw as Counsel.

l.of 4

ill.

Tne undersigned rei^ueocs cne courc re^rcer oc re,jOLCero who made cne

record in this cauoe to ^re^re <a re^rter's record, and chac cne cescimony included in che re^rcer'o record oe in ^ueoCion and mbwei: form.

Tne undersigned designates chac Che foj.low.uu, matters be included in cne reporter's record".

1. Teotomon^ of all witnesses, nearo in and outside the jury's presence, including ^uescions and objeccions of counsel and cne ruliiu, and reinarks of the courrc chereon", 2. Voir dice of jury's venire, including objections of counsel and Che ruling and remarks of Che courC chereon;

3. Arguments and 0(jeniny and closing statements of counsel/ including objeccions of counsel and cne ruling and remarks of che Courc thereon?

4. All inaCcers heard outside cne presence of che jur^ , including ,jre—

crial / crial and ,josc-trial nearm^s, charge conferences and bencn conferences , bail redaccion nearin.-,s, objeccions, rulings, and remarKs o£ tne Courc Chereon?

5. All bills of exception and testimony , liucludin^ objections of counsel/ and che ruling and remarks of che Courc tnereonf 6. Tescimony caKen during sencenciil^ proceedings/ including aryuntencs and objeccions of counsel/ and cne ruling and remarks of the Court cnereonT 7. Testimony caken duriny mocion for New Trial proceedings, including arguments and objections of counsel, and cne ruling and remarks of che Court thereon? and

8. All exnibits offered or introduced into evidence, including tnose of full Discovery.

2. of 4

IV.

The undersigned desires to file apro se response identifying those matters he submits are meritorious grounds for appeal. Access to the appellate record is necessary to prepare that response.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Nathaniel J. Frazier, Jr. prays this Court grant this Pro Se Motion for Access to Appellate Record.

Respectfully submitted,

By: AlaiJujLul &*£*££•

Nathaniel J. Frazier, Jr.

Pro Se

CONNALLY UNIT TDCJ1942796

899 PM 632

KENEDY, TEXAS 78119 15TH of MAY 2015

3 o£ A

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on isth of Ma/ 2015 a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing Pro Se Motion for Access to Appellate Record was served in accordance with Rule 9.5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on each party and/or counsel as listed below:

The State of Texas By Mail, certified Mr. Jason Ferguson us postal service Tom Green County District Attorney 124 West Beauregard Avenue San Angelo, Texas 76903 Appellee

NATHANIEL J. FRAZIER, JR. *'o se CONNALLY UNIT TDC3:#1942796

899 PM 632

KENEDY, TEXAS 78119

4 OH 4

HANIEL FRAZIER *1942796 M&rrG»<r\£>i £W ;-j,-i =• <*£>.)•& Se NALLY UNIT 21 M a \ :

FM 632 MAY .

AMOUNT

EDY, TEXAS 78i; PLACE STICKER AT TOP OF ENVELOPE TO THE RIGHT OF THE RETUHN ADDRESS, FOLD AT DOTTED LINE 00100304-26

CERTIFIED MAIL

JEFFREY D. KYLE/CLERK TURFI RECEIPT THIRD COURT OF APPEALS REQUESTED 7D1M S1E0 DDDl 157b "ITPS P.O. BOX 12547 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 CONFIDENTIAL MAIL** LEGAL

7S7ii254747 llilii»-i«H'i«iii!liiiIil')II»»llilliiiH'Hli!ii-»"'i'i 19TH of MAY 2015

V