Nathaniel Flores Pazcoguin v. Donald A. Radcliffe, District Director Immigration and Naturalization Service

308 F.3d 934, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 12299, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10636, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 22357, 2002 WL 31399082
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2002·No. 00-70595·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Dissent by

Judge BERZON.

ORDER

The opinion in this case, filed June 25, 2002 and published at 292 F.3d 1209 (9th Cir.2002), is amended by striking therefrom the dissent of Judge Berzon, and substituting in its place Judge Berzon’s dissent filed contemporaneously with this order. No change is made in the majority opinion.

Judges Thompson and O’Scannlain have voted to deny the Petition for Rehearing. Judge O’Scannlain has voted to deny the Petition for Rehearing En Banc, and Judge Thompson has recommended denial of that petition. Judge Berzon has voted to grant the Petition for Rehearing and the Petition for Rehearing En Banc.

The full court has been advised of the Petition for Rehearing En Banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on that petition. See Fed. R.App. P. 35(b).

The Petition for Rehearing and the Petition for Rehearing En Banc are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nathaniel Flores Pazcoguin v. Donald A. Radcliffe, District Director Immigration and Naturalization Service, 308 F.3d 934, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 12299, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10636, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 22357, 2002 WL 31399082 (9th Cir. 2002).

308 F.3d 934 (Nathaniel Flores Pazcoguin v. Donald A. Radcliffe, District Director Immigration and Naturalization Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related