Nathaniel Erke v. State of Florida
154 So. 3d 389
This text of 154 So. 3d 389 (Nathaniel Erke v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Nathaniel Erke v. State of Florida, 154 So. 3d 389 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).
Opinions
The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Johnson v. Wainwright
463 So. 2d 207 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Osteen v. State
12 So. 3d 927 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Mendez v. State
28 So. 3d 948 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Longley v. State
902 So. 2d 925 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Bates v. State
468 So. 2d 207 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1985)
TOWBRIDGE v. State
45 So. 3d 484 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Baxter v. State
127 So. 3d 726 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Davalos v. State
988 So. 2d 130 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
154 So. 3d 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nathaniel-erke-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2014.