Nathaniel Erke v. State of Florida

154 So. 3d 389
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 1, 2014·No. 1D13-3858·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

MARSTILLER and MAKAR, JJ., concur. THOMAS, J., Specially Concurring with Opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nathaniel Erke v. State of Florida, 154 So. 3d 389 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

154 So. 3d 389 (Nathaniel Erke v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Johnson v. Wainwright
463 So. 2d 207 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Osteen v. State
12 So. 3d 927 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Mendez v. State
28 So. 3d 948 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Longley v. State
902 So. 2d 925 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Bates v. State
468 So. 2d 207 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1985)
TOWBRIDGE v. State
45 So. 3d 484 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Baxter v. State
127 So. 3d 726 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Davalos v. State
988 So. 2d 130 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)