Nathaniel Costley, Sr. v. Christina Steiner

689 F. App'x 753
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 25, 2017·No. 17-1128·Unpublished·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel M. Costley, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his complaint in which he asserted claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and state law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Costley v. Steiner, No. 1:16-cv-01447-GLR (D. Md. Jan. 4, 2017 & Jan. 26, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nathaniel Costley, Sr. v. Christina Steiner, 689 F. App'x 753 (4th Cir. 2017).

689 F. App'x 753 (Nathaniel Costley, Sr. v. Christina Steiner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related