Nathaniel Costley, Sr. v. Christina Steiner
This text of 689 F. App'x 753 (Nathaniel Costley, Sr. v. Christina Steiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Nathaniel M. Costley, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his complaint in which he asserted claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and state law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Costley v. Steiner, No. 1:16-cv-01447-GLR (D. Md. Jan. 4, 2017 & Jan. 26, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
689 F. App'x 753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nathaniel-costley-sr-v-christina-steiner-ca4-2017.