Nathanael Jack v. MFT - Creekside Vue, LLC

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 30, 2025·No. 03-24-00773-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 30, 2025

NO. 03-24-00773-CV

Nathanael Jack, Appellant

v.

MFT - Creekside Vue, LLC, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF COMAL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES TRIANA, THEOFANIS, AND CRUMP DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE CRUMP

This is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on November 20, 2024.

Having reviewed the record, the Court holds that appellant has not prosecuted his appeal and did

not comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal

for want of prosecution. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication

of costs is made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nathanael Jack v. MFT - Creekside Vue, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Nathanael Jack v. MFT - Creekside Vue, LLC (Nathanael Jack v. MFT - Creekside Vue, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.