Nathanael Jack v. MFT - Creekside Vue, LLC
This text of Nathanael Jack v. MFT - Creekside Vue, LLC (Nathanael Jack v. MFT - Creekside Vue, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 30, 2025
NO. 03-24-00773-CV
Nathanael Jack, Appellant
v.
MFT - Creekside Vue, LLC, Appellee
APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF COMAL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES TRIANA, THEOFANIS, AND CRUMP DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE CRUMP
This is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on November 20, 2024.
Having reviewed the record, the Court holds that appellant has not prosecuted his appeal and did
not comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal
for want of prosecution. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication
of costs is made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nathanael Jack v. MFT - Creekside Vue, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nathanael-jack-v-mft-creekside-vue-llc-texapp-2025.