Nathan Winfield, Sr. and Barbara Winfield v. Eagle Ranch Homeowners Association

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 20, 2023
Docket14-23-00353-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Nathan Winfield, Sr. and Barbara Winfield v. Eagle Ranch Homeowners Association (Nathan Winfield, Sr. and Barbara Winfield v. Eagle Ranch Homeowners Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nathan Winfield, Sr. and Barbara Winfield v. Eagle Ranch Homeowners Association, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 20, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00353-CV

NATHAN WINFIELD, SR. AND BARBARA WINFIELD, Appellants

V.

EAGLE RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 151st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021-23010

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from an order signed May 8, 2023 granting a motion to enforce a settlement agreement. Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). When orders do not dispose of all pending parties and claims, the orders remain interlocutory and unappealable until final judgment is rendered unless a statutory exception applies. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). By its terms, the order did not dispose of the underlying trial court proceeding. Cf. B.Z.B., Inc. v. Clark, 273 S.W.3d 899, 902 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, no pet.) (holding an order granting a motion to enforce a settlement agreement was final and appealable when the appellate record did not indicate there were any “unresolved issues or parties”).

On June 1, 2023, notification was transmitted to the parties that the appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice unless any party demonstrated this court has jurisdiction over the appeal on or before June 12, 2023. See Tex. R. App. P. 4.1(a), 42.3(a). No party has filed a response.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Poissant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)
Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson
53 S.W.3d 352 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)
B.Z.B., Inc. v. Clark
273 S.W.3d 899 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)
Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps
842 S.W.2d 266 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nathan Winfield, Sr. and Barbara Winfield v. Eagle Ranch Homeowners Association, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nathan-winfield-sr-and-barbara-winfield-v-eagle-ranch-homeowners-texapp-2023.