Nathan v. State

556 S.W.3d 99
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 19, 2018
DocketNo. ED 104749
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 556 S.W.3d 99 (Nathan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nathan v. State, 556 S.W.3d 99 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*100Ledale Nathan ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment, after an evidentiary hearing, denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant was convicted, following a jury trial, of 26 counts.1 Movant's motion for post-conviction relief challenges the conviction of two counts of first-degree assault, in violation of Section 565.050 (RSMo. 2000);2 three counts of first-degree robbery, in violation of Section 569.020; four counts of kidnapping, in violation of Section 565.110; and ten counts of armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.014. Movant was effectively sentenced to five life sentences and five 15-year sentences on the nonhomicide convictions challenged in his motion for post-conviction relief. The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed his convictions and sentences in State v. Nathan, 522 S.W.3d 881 (Mo. banc 2017).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nathan v. Lewis
E.D. Missouri, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
556 S.W.3d 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nathan-v-state-moctapp-2018.