Nathan v. State

520 So. 2d 317, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 539, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 674, 1988 WL 13734
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 24, 1988
DocketNo. 86-2801
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 520 So. 2d 317 (Nathan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nathan v. State, 520 So. 2d 317, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 539, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 674, 1988 WL 13734 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from appellant’s conviction of battery and affray, we find error only in that the trial court delegated to appellant’s probation or community control officer the determination of the amount of restitution appellant was to make. On remand, the amount of any restitution to be imposed shall be determined by the trial court. Mansell v. State, 498 So.2d 604 (Fla.2d DCA 1986); Buchanan v. State, 483 So.2d 537 (Fla.2d DCA 1986). Appellant’s convictions are otherwise affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Snyder v. State
597 So. 2d 384 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
520 So. 2d 317, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 539, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 674, 1988 WL 13734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nathan-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.