Nathan v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

30 Misc. 761, 61 N.Y.S. 1142
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 30 Misc. 761 (Nathan v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nathan v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co., 30 Misc. 761, 61 N.Y.S. 1142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).

Opinion

Freedman, P. J.

There was sufficient testimony in this case, both upon the question of the negligence of the defendant and the freedom from contributory negligence, on the part of the plaintiff, to raise a question of fact for the determination of the. jury, and it not appearing that injustice has heen done, nor that reversible error has been committed, in either the reception or rejection of evidence, the judgment should be affirmed..

MacLean, J., concurs, Leventritt, J., taking no part.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Misc. 761, 61 N.Y.S. 1142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nathan-v-metropolitan-street-railway-co-nyappterm-1899.