Nathan v. Crenshaw
710 N.W.2d 260, 474 Mich. 1024
This text of 710 N.W.2d 260 (Nathan v. Crenshaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Nathan v. Crenshaw, 710 N.W.2d 260, 474 Mich. 1024 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
David E. NATHAN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellant,
v.
Larry CRENSHAW, Defendant/Cross-Defendant, and
Reginald Smith, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff, Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 12, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Tyrpin
710 N.W.2d 260 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
710 N.W.2d 260, 474 Mich. 1024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nathan-v-crenshaw-mich-2006.