Nathan v. Crenshaw

Michigan Supreme Court

Nathan v. Crenshaw

710 N.W.2d 260, 474 Mich. 1024

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 30, 2006·No. 129317·Published

Opinion

710 N.W.2d 260 (2006) 474 Mich. 1024

David E. NATHAN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellant,
v.
Larry CRENSHAW, Defendant/Cross-Defendant, and
Reginald Smith, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff, Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee.

Docket No. 129317. COA No. 260219.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 30, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 12, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

710 N.W.2d 260 (2006) 474 Mich. 1024

David E. NATHAN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellant,
v.
Larry CRENSHAW, Defendant/Cross-Defendant, and
Reginald Smith, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff, Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee.

Docket No. 129317. COA No. 260219.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 30, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 12, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Nathan v. Crenshaw, 710 N.W.2d 260, 474 Mich. 1024 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

710 N.W.2d 260 (Nathan v. Crenshaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

David E. NATHAN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. Larry CRENSHAW, Defendant/Cross-Defendant, and Reginald Smith, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff, Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee.

Related

David E. NATHAN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellant,
v.
Larry CRENSHAW, Defendant/Cross-Defendant, and
Reginald Smith, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff, Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee.