Nathan Silberberg Galleries, Ltd. v. Holmes Protection of New York, Inc.
642 N.E.2d 321, 84 N.Y.2d 859, 618 N.Y.S.2d 3, 1994 N.Y. LEXIS 2775
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative (see, Gutter Furs v Jewelers Protection Servs., 79 NY2d 1027; Sommer v Federal Signal Corp., 79 NY2d 540, 554).
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nathan Silberberg Galleries, Ltd. v. Holmes Protection of New York, Inc., 642 N.E.2d 321, 84 N.Y.2d 859, 618 N.Y.S.2d 3, 1994 N.Y. LEXIS 2775 (N.Y. 1994).
642 N.E.2d 321 (Nathan Silberberg Galleries, Ltd. v. Holmes Protection of New York, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Guston Furs Ltd. v. Comet Realty Corp.
225 A.D.2d 417 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)