Nathan Renner Jung v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nathan Renner Jung v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 19, 2015

Docket15-1073

StatusPublished

This text of Nathan Renner Jung v. State of Florida (Nathan Renner Jung v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nathan Renner Jung v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NATHAN RENNER JUNG, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D15-1073

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed March 20, 2015.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original Jurisdiction.

Nathan Renner Jung, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the

merits.

ROBERTS, CLARK, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI