NATHAN MILLS vs STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 17, 2023·No. 22-1079·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

NATHAN MILLS, Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D22-1079 LT Case No. 2016-CF-2040

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

________________________________/ Opinion filed March 17, 2023

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Lisa D. Herndon, Judge.

William R. Ponall, of Ponall Law, Maitland, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Caldwell, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur. EDWARDS, J., concurs specially, with opinion.

Case No. 5D22-1079

LT Case No. 2016-CF-002040

EDWARDS, J., specially concurring.

Appellant's trial counsel was not ineffective in any sense of the word.

Appellant's arguments to the contrary are unpersuasive factually and legally.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NATHAN MILLS vs STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2023).

NATHAN MILLS vs STATE OF FLORIDA (NATHAN MILLS vs STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.