NATHAN MILLS vs STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of NATHAN MILLS vs STATE OF FLORIDA (NATHAN MILLS vs STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
NATHAN MILLS,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D22-1079 LT Case No. 2016-CF-2040
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed March 17, 2023
3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Lisa D. Herndon, Judge.
William R. Ponall, of Ponall Law, Maitland, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Caldwell, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
WALLIS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur. EDWARDS, J., concurs specially, with opinion. Case No. 5D22-1079 LT Case No. 2016-CF-002040
EDWARDS, J., specially concurring.
Appellant's trial counsel was not ineffective in any sense of the word.
Appellant's arguments to the contrary are unpersuasive factually and legally.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
NATHAN MILLS vs STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nathan-mills-vs-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2023.