Nathan Metz v. Tusico, Incorporated
This text of 260 F.2d 957 (Nathan Metz v. Tusico, Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an earlier appeal in this case we vacated the judgment for the defendantappellee and remanded the case to the District Court. Metz v. Tusico, Inc., 4 Cir., 1957, 246 F.2d 54. That Court then took further testimony and made additional findings, concluding that there was no breach by the appellee of its warranty that water was available to the property sold by it to the appellant, and rendered judgment for the appellee. We perceive no error in the Judge’s findings of fact or conclusions of law, and the judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the District Court’s opinion. 260 F.Supp. 393.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
260 F.2d 957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nathan-metz-v-tusico-incorporated-ca4-1958.