Nathan Lewis v. Robert C. Jenkins
Opinion
NATHAN LEWIS * NO. 2020-CA-0333
VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL ROBERT C. JENKINS * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA *******
APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO. 2016-11668, DIVISION “N-8” Honorable Ethel Simms Julien, Judge ****** Judge Daniel L. Dysart ****** (Court composed of Chief Judge James F. McKay, III, Judge Daniel L. Dysart, Judge Dale N. Atkins)
ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING
Scott G. Jones LAW OFFICE OF SCOTT G. JONES 1414 Gause Boulevard, Suite 8 Slidell, LA 70458
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT
Robert Charles Jenkins, Jr. 631 St. Charles Avenue New Orleans, LA 70130
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLEE
APPLICATION FOR REHEARING GRANTED; JUDGMENT CLARIFIED AND RENDERED
MAY 5, 2021 DLD Following this Court’s April 7, 2021 decision, Nathan Lewis filed an JFM DNA application for rehearing, seeking clarification of our decision in two respects.
First, he seeks clarification with respect to a discrepancy in the amount awarded,
as our decision contained two different amounts. Second, he seeks clarification as
to whether judicial interest and costs were awarded to him. We grant rehearing for
the purposes of clarifying our prior decision on these two issues.
In our original opinion, we erroneously stated in our opening paragraph that
Mr. Nathan was awarded the sum of $15,700. As we indicated thereafter in our
decision, we awarded Mr. Nathan $15,750, representing those amount for which he
is entitled to reimbursement, and an additional $3,800, representing those amounts
Mr. Nathan overpaid to Mr. Jenkins. Thus, the total award to Mr. Nathan is
$19,550.
With respect to interest, La. C.C.P. art. 1921 provides that “[t]he court shall
award interest in the judgment as prayed for or as provided by law.” Likewise, La.
C.C.P. art. 1920 provides that, “[u]nless the judgment provides otherwise, costs
shall be paid by the party cast . . . .” Based on the foregoing, Mr. Nathan is
1 entitled to judicial interest from the date of judicial demand and for all costs in
these proceedings.
We therefore amend our decision to include an award to Mr. Nathan of
judicial interest from the date of judicial demand and for all costs of this
proceeding.
APPLICATION FOR REHEARING GRANTED; JUDGMENT CLARIFIED AND RENDERED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nathan Lewis v. Robert C. Jenkins (Nathan Lewis v. Robert C. Jenkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.