Nathan Lee Wenzel v. State
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-16-00315-CR ____________________
NATHAN LEE WENZEL, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________
On Appeal from the 258th District Court Polk County, Texas Trial Cause No. 24,626 ________________________________________________________ _____________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On May 13, 2016, the trial court sentenced Nathan Lee Wenzel on a
conviction for theft. Wenzel filed a notice of appeal on September 6, 2016. The
trial court signed a certification, certifying that this is a plea-bargain case and that
the defendant did not have a right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The
district clerk provided the trial court’s certification to the Court of Appeals.
On September 6, 2016, we notified the parties that we would dismiss the
appeal unless the appellant established grounds for continuing the appeal. No
1 response has been filed. Because the trial court’s certification shows the defendant
does not have the right of appeal, we must dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.
25.2(d). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
________________________________ HOLLIS HORTON Justice
Submitted on October 4, 2016 Opinion Delivered October 5, 2016 Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nathan Lee Wenzel v. State (Nathan Lee Wenzel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.