Nathan Gene Collins v. the State of Texas
This text of Nathan Gene Collins v. the State of Texas (Nathan Gene Collins v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-24-00151-CR
NATHAN GENE COLLINS, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 320th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 083186-D-CR, Honorable Steven Denny, Presiding
December 11, 2024 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Nathan Gene Collins, appeals his conviction for unlawful possession of
a firearm1 and sentence to twenty-five years of confinement. Appellant’s brief was
originally due August 28, 2024, but we granted Appellant’s appointed counsel three
extensions to file a brief due to counsel’s caseload. By letter of November 4, 2024, we
admonished Appellant’s counsel that no further extensions would be granted and that
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 46.04(e). failure to file a brief by November 27 would result in the appeal being abated and the
cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings without further notice. To date,
Appellant’s counsel has neither filed a brief nor had any further communication with this
Court.
Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further
proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall
determine the following:
1. whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;
2. whether Appellant is indigent;
3. why a timely appellate brief has not been filed on behalf of Appellant;
4. whether Appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeal;
5. whether Appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel;
6. whether new counsel should be appointed; and
7. if Appellant desires to continue the appeal, the date the Court may expect
Appellant’s brief to be filed.
The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by January 10, 2025.
If it is determined that Appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent, and has
been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint new counsel;
the name, address, email address, phone number, and state bar number of any newly
appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings.
2 Should Appellant’s counsel file a brief on or before December 27, 2024, she is
directed to immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial
court shall not be required to take any further action.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nathan Gene Collins v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nathan-gene-collins-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.