Nathan Garcia v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 13, 2024
Docket07-24-00021-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Nathan Garcia v. the State of Texas (Nathan Garcia v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nathan Garcia v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-24-00021-CR

NATHAN GARCIA, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 140th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019-417369, Honorable Douglas H. Freitag, Presiding

March 13, 2024 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ.

Appellant, Nathan Garcia, appeals his conviction for evading arrest using a

vehicle1 and sentence of two years’ confinement. The appellate record was originally due

February 8, 2024. Although Appellant has made payment arrangements for the reporter’s

record, due March 22, 2024, he has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s

record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.2; 35.3(a)(2). By letter, we directed Appellant to make the

1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 38.04(b)(2)(A). necessary payment arrangements by February 20 or we would remand the cause to the

trial court for further proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.2, 37.3(a)(2). To date, Appellant

has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record and has had no further

communication with this Court.

Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court to

determine the following:

1. whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;

2. whether Appellant is indigent;

3. whether Appellant is entitled to have the clerk’s record furnished without charge pursuant to Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.2;

4. if Appellant is not entitled to have the clerk’s record furnished without charge, the date Appellant will make acceptable payment arrangements for the clerk’s record;

5. whether Appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeal;

6. whether Appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel; and

7. whether new counsel should be appointed.

The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a

supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by April 12, 2024.

If it is determined that Appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent, and has

been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint new counsel;

the name, address, email address, phone number, and state bar number of any newly

appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings.

2 Should Appellant pay for the clerk’s record on or before March 27, 2024,

Appellant’s counsel is directed to immediately notify the trial court in writing, whereupon

the trial court shall not be required to take any further action.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 38.04
Texas PE § 38.04(b)(2)(A)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nathan Garcia v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nathan-garcia-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.