Nathan Garcia v. the State of Texas
This text of Nathan Garcia v. the State of Texas (Nathan Garcia v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-24-00021-CR
NATHAN GARCIA, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 140th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019-417369, Honorable Douglas H. Freitag, Presiding
March 13, 2024 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Nathan Garcia, appeals his conviction for evading arrest using a
vehicle1 and sentence of two years’ confinement. The appellate record was originally due
February 8, 2024. Although Appellant has made payment arrangements for the reporter’s
record, due March 22, 2024, he has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s
record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.2; 35.3(a)(2). By letter, we directed Appellant to make the
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 38.04(b)(2)(A). necessary payment arrangements by February 20 or we would remand the cause to the
trial court for further proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.2, 37.3(a)(2). To date, Appellant
has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record and has had no further
communication with this Court.
Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court to
determine the following:
1. whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;
2. whether Appellant is indigent;
3. whether Appellant is entitled to have the clerk’s record furnished without charge pursuant to Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.2;
4. if Appellant is not entitled to have the clerk’s record furnished without charge, the date Appellant will make acceptable payment arrangements for the clerk’s record;
5. whether Appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeal;
6. whether Appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel; and
7. whether new counsel should be appointed.
The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by April 12, 2024.
If it is determined that Appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent, and has
been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint new counsel;
the name, address, email address, phone number, and state bar number of any newly
appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings.
2 Should Appellant pay for the clerk’s record on or before March 27, 2024,
Appellant’s counsel is directed to immediately notify the trial court in writing, whereupon
the trial court shall not be required to take any further action.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nathan Garcia v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nathan-garcia-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.