Nathan Elmont Eli v. Louis S. Nelson, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin

498 F.2d 1340, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7745
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 9, 1974·No. 73-2346·Published

Opinion

ORDER AFFIRMING

The district court order denying habeas corpus relief on a state judgment is affirmed. See Eli v. Nelson, 360 F.Supp. 225 (N.D.Cal.1973).

The district court examined the state court record and was satisfied that questions concerning Eli’s confession were adequately explored by the state court.

We conclude that the federal district court ruling that no evidentiary hearing was necessary was within its discretion.

The case is pre Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), but post Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977 (1964). The district court found on the record that there was no violation of Escobedo. The finding was justified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nathan Elmont Eli v. Louis S. Nelson, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin, 498 F.2d 1340, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7745 (9th Cir. 1974).

498 F.2d 1340 (Nathan Elmont Eli v. Louis S. Nelson, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Escobedo v. Illinois
378 U.S. 478 (Supreme Court, 1964)
Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1966)
Eli v. Nelson
360 F. Supp. 225 (N.D. California, 1973)