Nathan Earl Burgess v. State of Texas
Opinion
Order entered October 1, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00216-CR
NATHAN EARL BURGESS, Appellant V.
STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 001-86625-2012
ORDER
The Court has before it appellant’s September 15, 2014 pro se motion to recuse Justice
Myers. Appellant is represented by counsel and is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1981). Accordingly, the Court DENIES appellant’s pro se motion to recuse.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to William Schultz and John Rolater.
/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT
CHIEF JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nathan Earl Burgess v. State of Texas (Nathan Earl Burgess v. State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.