Nathan Earl Burgess v. State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 1, 2014·No. 05-14-00216-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered October 1, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00216-CR

NATHAN EARL BURGESS, Appellant V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 001-86625-2012

ORDER

The Court has before it appellant’s September 15, 2014 pro se motion to recuse Justice

Myers. Appellant is represented by counsel and is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1981). Accordingly, the Court DENIES appellant’s pro se motion to recuse.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to William Schultz and John Rolater.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nathan Earl Burgess v. State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Nathan Earl Burgess v. State of Texas (Nathan Earl Burgess v. State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rudd v. State
616 S.W.2d 623 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)