Nathan C. Braun v. Christopher Vierzba

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Nathan C. Braun, Civ. No. 26-511 (JWB/DLM)

Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE Christopher Vierzba,

Defendant.

United States Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on January 28, 2026. (Doc. No. 3.) No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted. Absent timely objections, the R&R is reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found. Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all the files, records, and proceedings in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The January 28, 2026 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 3) is ACCEPTED;

2. Plaintiff Nathan C. Braun’s Complaint (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and

3. Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. No. 2) is DENIED as moot.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Date: February 25, 2026 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell JERRY W. BLACKWELL United States District Judge