Nathan Bilsky and Sarah Bilsky v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Eighth Circuit

Nathan Bilsky and Sarah Bilsky v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

271 F.2d 414

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 30, 1959·No. 16274·Published

Opinion

271 F.2d 414

Nathan BILSKY and Sarah Bilsky, Petitioners,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 16274.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

October 30, 1959.

W. Munro Roberts, Jr., and William R. MacGreevy, St. Louis, Mo., for petitioners.

Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Chief, Appellate Section, U. S. Department of Justice, Arch M. Cantrall, Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, and Rollin H. Transue, Sp. Atty., Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D. C., for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment: Petition to review decision of The Tax Court of the United States, 31 T.C. 35, dismissed, on motion of petitioners.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

271 F.2d 414

Nathan BILSKY and Sarah Bilsky, Petitioners,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 16274.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

October 30, 1959.

W. Munro Roberts, Jr., and William R. MacGreevy, St. Louis, Mo., for petitioners.

Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Chief, Appellate Section, U. S. Department of Justice, Arch M. Cantrall, Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, and Rollin H. Transue, Sp. Atty., Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D. C., for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment: Petition to review decision of The Tax Court of the United States, 31 T.C. 35, dismissed, on motion of petitioners.

Nathan Bilsky and Sarah Bilsky v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 271 F.2d 414 (8th Cir. 1959).

Pincite

271 F.2d 414 (Nathan Bilsky and Sarah Bilsky v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.