Nathan Bilsky and Sarah Bilsky v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
This text of 271 F.2d 414 (Nathan Bilsky and Sarah Bilsky v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
271 F.2d 414
Nathan BILSKY and Sarah Bilsky, Petitioners,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
No. 16274.
United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.
October 30, 1959.
W. Munro Roberts, Jr., and William R. MacGreevy, St. Louis, Mo., for petitioners.
Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Chief, Appellate Section, U. S. Department of Justice, Arch M. Cantrall, Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, and Rollin H. Transue, Sp. Atty., Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D. C., for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
Judgment: Petition to review decision of The Tax Court of the United States, 31 T.C. 35, dismissed, on motion of petitioners.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 F.2d 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nathan-bilsky-and-sarah-bilsky-v-commissioner-of-i-ca8-1959.