Natera, Jose Angel
This text of Natera, Jose Angel (Natera, Jose Angel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-91,540-01
EX PARTE JOSE ANGEL NATERA, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. CR52010A IN THE 441ST DISTRICT COURT FROM MIDLAND COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of assault by choking and sentenced to four years’ imprisonment.
Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the
district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends, among other things, that he was denied adequate notice from the Board
of Pardons and Paroles that he would be considered for release on discretionary mandatory
supervision and/or parole. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. See
Ex parte Geiken, 28 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000); Ex parte Retzlaff, 135 S.W.3d 45
(Tex. Crim. App. 2004). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the
appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). 2
The trial court shall order the Board of Pardons and Paroles’s Office of the General Counsel
to obtain a response from a person with knowledge of relevant facts. In developing the record, the
trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a
hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be
represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX .
CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately
notify this Court of counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant
was provided adequate notice from the Board of Pardons and Paroles that he would be considered
for release on discretionary mandatory supervision and/or parole. The trial court may make any other
findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: September 16, 2020
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Natera, Jose Angel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/natera-jose-angel-texcrimapp-2020.