Natelson v. Droesch Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Natelson v. Droesch Realty Corp.

238 A.D. 865

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 238 A.D. 865 (Natelson v. Droesch Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Natelson v. Droesch Realty Corp., 238 A.D. 865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Order amending order of September 2, 1932, settling the receiver’s accounts, modified by striking out the following: “less the amount of $444.36 which was stolen through no fault of the receiver,” and as so modified affirmed, without costs. It appears that the moneys stolen without any fault on the part of the receiver were August rents. As this rent was to go to the Kings County Savings Bank pursuant to the order of August 22, 1932, the loss must be chargeable to that institution and not to the plaintiff, Natelson. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order amending order of September 2, 1932, settling the receiver’s accounts, modified by striking out the following: “less the amount of $444.36 which was stolen through no fault of the receiver,” and as so modified affirmed, without costs. It appears that the moneys stolen without any fault on the part of the receiver were August rents. As this rent was to go to the Kings County Savings Bank pursuant to the order of August 22, 1932, the loss must be chargeable to that institution and not to the plaintiff, Natelson. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 A.D. 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/natelson-v-droesch-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1933.