Natco Corp. v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Natco Corp. v. New York City Housing Authority

20 A.D.2d 873, 251 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3980

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 21, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 20 A.D.2d 873 (Natco Corp. v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Natco Corp. v. New York City Housing Authority, 20 A.D.2d 873, 251 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3980 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from order entered on October 21, 1963, denying defendant Housing Authority’s motion to dismiss the complaint seeking judgment declaring illegal and discriminatory defendant’s specifications for facing brick to be used in the construction of housing projects, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs. Defendant has always contended that the specifications complained of did not in any respect improperly or illegally restrict plaintiff from bidding freely to supply the types of bricks specified. As -discussed and proposed, however, during the course of the argument of this appeal, defendant has voluntarily and satisfactorily modified the allegedly offending specifications so as to remove any doubt on that score. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from order entered on October 21, 1963, denying defendant Housing Authority’s motion to dismiss the complaint seeking judgment declaring illegal and discriminatory defendant’s specifications for facing brick to be used in the construction of housing projects, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs. Defendant has always contended that the specifications complained of did not in any respect improperly or illegally restrict plaintiff from bidding freely to supply the types of bricks specified. As -discussed and proposed, however, during the course of the argument of this appeal, defendant has voluntarily and satisfactorily modified the allegedly offending specifications so as to remove any doubt on that score. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 873, 251 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/natco-corp-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-1964.