Natchez, Jackson & Columbus Railroad v. Cook

63 Miss. 38
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 63 Miss. 38 (Natchez, Jackson & Columbus Railroad v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Natchez, Jackson & Columbus Railroad v. Cook, 63 Miss. 38 (Mich. 1885).

Opinion

Aknodd, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

On the facts of record we concur in the conclusion reached in the court below, that the deceased was a minor, and had not been emancipated by his mother at the time of his death.

It may be conceded that the suit could not be maintained by appellee, as the mother of the child, under § 1510 of the code, and the amendment thereto made by the act of 1884, and that it is the doctrine of the common law that a civil action cannot be prosecuted to recover damages for an injury resulting in the death of a human being, but there is still a phase of the case in favor of appellee’s right to sue. Death did not result instantly from the injuries received by the deceased. As surviving parent, the mother was entitled to the services of her child, and, without reference to the statute, she might sue for and recover at least the value of his services from the date of the injuries received by him to his death, [43]*43and any incidental expenses she may have incurred for medical attention, care, and nursing up to that time. She would have a remedy at common law, not for the death of the child, or for the injuries suffered by him, but for the loss of his services and incidental expenses, as above specified. Cooley on Torts 262; Hyatt v. Adams, 16 Mich. 180; Covington, etc., R. R. Co. v. Packer, 9 Bush 455 ; Sullivan v. U. P. R. R. Co., 3 Dill 334.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Long v. McKinney
897 So. 2d 160 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2004)
Douglas Long v. Lori McKinney
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2002
Brandon HMA, Inc. v. Bradshaw
809 So. 2d 611 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2001)
Brandon HMA, Inc. v. Dawn Bradshaw
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2000
Munn v. Southern Health Plan, Inc.
719 F. Supp. 525 (N.D. Mississippi, 1989)
Berryhill v. Nichols
158 So. 470 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1935)
Kirkpatrick v. Ferguson-Palmer Co.
77 So. 803 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1917)
McGarr v. National & Providence Worsted Mills
60 L.R.A. 122 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1902)
McVey v. Illinois Central Railroad
73 Miss. 487 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1895)
Bradley v. Sattler
41 N.E. 171 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1895)
Meyer v. King
35 L.R.A. 474 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1894)
Horgan v. Pacific Mills
33 N.E. 581 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 Miss. 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/natchez-jackson-columbus-railroad-v-cook-miss-1885.