NATAVIS BAYNARD vs STATE OF FLORIDA
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
NATAVIS BAYNARD, Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D22-2573 LT Case Nos.2020-CF-001378 2016-CF-000675
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
________________________________/ Decision filed February 17, 2023
3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County, Howard O. McGillin, Jr., Judge.
Natavis Baynard, Lake Butler, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
MAKAR and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur. EDWARDS, J., concurs specially, with opinion.
Case No. 5D22-2573
LT Case Nos. 2016-CF-000675, 2020-CF-001378
EDWARDS, J., specially concurring.
I note that affirming the order denying Appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion will not prevent Appellant from pursuing any other post-conviction relief if he can do so in good faith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
NATAVIS BAYNARD vs STATE OF FLORIDA (NATAVIS BAYNARD vs STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.