Natasha Ramsey v. Sunset Mortgage, Its Assigns and/or Successors in Interest, Its Affiants' and U.S. Persons of Interest, JP Court No. 1, County Court at Law No.1 Tarrant County Constables Pct 7

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00206-CV

NATASHA RAMSEY APPELLANT

V.

SUNSET MORTGAGE, ITS APPELLEES ASSIGNS AND/OR SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST, ITS AFFIANTS' AND U.S. PERSONS OF INTEREST, JP COURT NO. 1, COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO.1 TARRANT COUNTY CONSTABLES PCT 7

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On August 13, 2013, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk

responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk’s record as

required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P.

35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

unless appellant, within ten days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s

record and provided this court with proof of payment.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s

record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want

of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 29, 2013