Natasha Ducali v. Humberto Ducali

274 So. 3d 558
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 9, 2019
Docket17-1002
StatusPublished

This text of 274 So. 3d 558 (Natasha Ducali v. Humberto Ducali) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Natasha Ducali v. Humberto Ducali, 274 So. 3d 558 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D17-1002 _____________________________

NATASHA DUCALI,

Appellant,

v.

HUMBERTO DUCALI,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. John I. Guy, Judge.

July 9, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The former wife appeals the trial court’s orders on the former husband’s motion for contempt and enforcement and its denial of her motions for rehearing. We write only to address the trial court’s decision to award the former husband sole parental responsibility over educational and health care decisions for the two children. At no time did the former husband plead for a change in parental responsibility, and the issue was not tried by consent. Accordingly, the trial court abused its discretion in awarding unpled relief to the former husband. See Russell v. Russell, 240 So. 3d 890 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (reversing portion of the final judgment awarding the mother sole authority over daycare decisions when the mother never requested such a modification); Abbott v. Abbott, 98 So. 3d 616, 617-18 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (noting to grant unrequested relief is an abuse of discretion and reversible error). We reverse the portion of the order awarding the former husband unpled relief. We affirm in all other respects.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

B.L. THOMAS, ROBERTS, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Robert J. Slama of Robert J. Slama, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Michael L. Duncan of Duncan Trial & Family Law, Jacksonville; Diane L. Paull, Jacksonville Beach, for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Christopher Blake Russell v. Laura P. Russell
240 So. 3d 890 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Abbott v. Abbott
98 So. 3d 616 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
274 So. 3d 558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/natasha-ducali-v-humberto-ducali-fladistctapp-2019.