Natalicchio v. McGoldrick
279 A.D. 796, 109 N.Y.S.2d 431, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4855
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 14, 1952·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Substantial evidence having been adduced before the State Rent Administrator to warrant his determination, the Special Term was without authority to substitute its judgment for that of the State Rent Administrator. (Matter of Kaplan v. McGoldrick, 279 App. Div. 615.) In view of the foregoing, the motion to dismiss the appeal of the intervener, renewed on argument, is dismissed as academic. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 869.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Natalicchio v. McGoldrick, 279 A.D. 796, 109 N.Y.S.2d 431, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
279 A.D. 796 (Natalicchio v. McGoldrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Yasser v. McGoldrick
282 A.D. 1056 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)
Grodofsky v. McGoldrick
279 A.D. 914 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)