Natalicchio v. McGoldrick
This text of 279 A.D. 796 (Natalicchio v. McGoldrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Substantial evidence having been adduced before the State Rent Administrator to warrant his determination, the Special Term was without authority to substitute its judgment for that of the State Rent Administrator. (Matter of Kaplan v. McGoldrick, 279 App. Div. 615.) In view of the foregoing, the motion to dismiss the appeal of the intervener, renewed on argument, is dismissed as academic. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 869.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 A.D. 796, 109 N.Y.S.2d 431, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/natalicchio-v-mcgoldrick-nyappdiv-1952.