Natale v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

8 A.D.2d 781, 186 N.Y.S.2d 795, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8226
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 9, 1959·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed on the law and in the exercise of discretion, without costs to either party. The amendment granted does not change the issues and, in our opinion, in no wise is indicative of the merits of the case. We give no more weight to the increased amount than we would have given had it been asserted originally. That is, an ad damnum clause merely informs an adversary of the maximum amount of the claim asserted without in any wise being proof of injury or indeed of liability. In the view we take we hold no more than that Special Term had, and exercised, its judicial discretion to grant the motion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Natale v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 8 A.D.2d 781, 186 N.Y.S.2d 795, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8226 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

8 A.D.2d 781 (Natale v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Sanger
618 S.E.2d 573 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 2005)
Finn v. Crystal Beach Transit Co.
55 A.D.2d 1001 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Barocas v. Schweikart & Co.
63 Misc. 2d 131 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1970)
Ferguson v. RE Ball and Company
173 S.E.2d 83 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1970)
State Ex Rel. Scott v. Taylor
160 S.E.2d 146 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1968)