Nat. Trucking Co., Inc. v. Gill

182 So. 220, 132 Fla. 844, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1840
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 16, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 182 So. 220 (Nat. Trucking Co., Inc. v. Gill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nat. Trucking Co., Inc. v. Gill, 182 So. 220, 132 Fla. 844, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1840 (Fla. 1938).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of error in each of these cases was taken to a final order made in a statutory proceeding denying a petition to stay an execution issued upon a judgment in an action for personal injury obtained in the ab *845 sence and without the knowledge of the trial or negligence of counsel for the defendant and without a compliance with the essential requirements of Rule 56 of the Circuit Court Rules in Common Law Actions. The defendant was organically entitled to notice and an opportunity to be present and to defend when the trial was had, and Rule 56 is designed to conserve such organic right. The bill of exceptions and the record proper show that counsel for the defendant was not negligent under the facts of the case and was therefore entitled to the notice contemplated by Rule 56 which is binding on the court and counsel.

Reversed.

Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Ci-iapman, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kantor v. Roffeld
4 Fla. Supp. 100 (Miami-Dade County Circuit Court, 1953)
Town of Coreytown v. State Ex Rel. Ervin
60 So. 2d 482 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 So. 220, 132 Fla. 844, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nat-trucking-co-inc-v-gill-fla-1938.