Nat Friedman Son, Inc. v. City of New York
188 N.E. 112, 262 N.Y. 665, 1933 N.Y. LEXIS 1196
Opinion
Order of the Appellate Division reversed and judgment of the Special Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, on the authority of Sikora Realty Corp. v.City of New York (
Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nat Friedman Son, Inc. v. City of New York, 188 N.E. 112, 262 N.Y. 665, 1933 N.Y. LEXIS 1196 (N.Y. 1933).
188 N.E. 112 (Nat Friedman Son, Inc. v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of New York v. Watkins
757 F. Supp. 72 (District of Columbia, 1991)