Nat. Bank of Chester Co. v. Com'rs of Chester Co.

U.S. Circuit Court

Nat. Bank of Chester Co. v. Com'rs of Chester Co.

14 F. 239, 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2740

DecidedOctober 2, 1882

StatusPublished

This text of 14 F. 239 (Nat. Bank of Chester Co. v. Com'rs of Chester Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nat. Bank of Chester Co. v. Com'rs of Chester Co., 14 F. 239, 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2740 (uscirct 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Bradley, Justice,

{orally.) We have no doubt that the act of assembly of June 10,1881, is constitutional. The title clearly expresses the purposes of the act; and the old law, as amended, is re-enacted at length in the supplemental act. Nor is the act repugnant. To declare an act of assembly repugnant, the repugnancy must appear upon its face, and must be in conflict with the main intent and object of the enactment. The bill is dismissed.

See Second Nat. Bank v. Caldwell, 13 Fed. Rep. 429, and note.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradley, Justice,

{orally.) We have no doubt that the act of assembly of June 10,1881, is constitutional. The title clearly expresses the purposes of the act; and the old law, as amended, is re-enacted at length in the supplemental act. Nor is the act repugnant. To declare an act of assembly repugnant, the repugnancy must appear upon its face, and must be in conflict with the main intent and object of the enactment. The bill is dismissed.

See Second Nat. Bank v. Caldwell, 13 Fed. Rep. 429, and note.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 F. 239, 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nat-bank-of-chester-co-v-comrs-of-chester-co-uscirct-1882.