Nasworthy v. State

94 S.E. 73, 21 Ga. App. 242, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 536
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 2, 1917
Docket9032
StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 73 (Nasworthy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nasworthy v. State, 94 S.E. 73, 21 Ga. App. 242, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 536 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

1. When considered in the light of the entire charge the court and the particular facts of the case, the instruction to which exception was taken was not erroneous.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur. Indictment for misdemeanor; from Terrell superior court-judge Worrill. 1 June 9, 1917. B. B. Jones, for plaintiff in error. B. T: Castellón?, solicitor-general, B. B. Arnold, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 73, 21 Ga. App. 242, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nasworthy-v-state-gactapp-1917.