Nassim v. Obama

District of Columbia

Nassim v. Obama

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedFebruary 12, 2013

DocketCivil Action No. 2009-1332

StatusPublished

This text of Nassim v. Obama (Nassim v. Obama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nassim v. Obama, (D.D.C. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED S'I`ATES DIS'I`RICT COUR"I` FOR 'I`HE DISTRIC'I` OF COLUMBIA

HAJH NASSIM, (ISN 10028), Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 09-1332 (HHK)

BARACK H. OBAMA, et al., Respondents.

\\»/\¢_/\»_/\_/"~__/\.J\_/\_/\J\¢.»/

[ ER

Upon consideration of Consent Motion to Deem Protected Inforrnatioii Highliglited in the Accolnpanying Proposed Public Factual Return for ISN 10028, and a review of that proposed public factual return, it is hereby ORDERED that Respondents’ motion is granted. The information identified by Respondents with green or gray highlighting in the version of the lactual return submitted under seal to the Court is deemed protected, pursuant to paragraphs 10 and 34 of the Protective Order governing this proceeding. lt is further ORDERED that Respondents tile on the public record, through the Court’s Electronic Case Filing system, a public version of the factual return nom which the information that was highlighted in the proposed public version submitted to the Court has been redacted.

lt is SO ORD]ERED.

Dated: %;//3 m C'

United States District judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED S'I`ATES DIS'I`RICT COUR"I` FOR 'I`HE DISTRIC'I` OF COLUMBIA

HAJH NASSIM, (ISN 10028), Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 09-1332 (HHK)

BARACK H. OBAMA, et al., Respondents.

\\»/\¢_/\»_/\_/"~__/\.J\_/\_/\J\¢.»/

[ ER

Upon consideration of Consent Motion to Deem Protected Inforrnatioii Highliglited in the Accolnpanying Proposed Public Factual Return for ISN 10028, and a review of that proposed public factual return, it is hereby ORDERED that Respondents’ motion is granted. The information identified by Respondents with green or gray highlighting in the version of the lactual return submitted under seal to the Court is deemed protected, pursuant to paragraphs 10 and 34 of the Protective Order governing this proceeding. lt is further ORDERED that Respondents tile on the public record, through the Court’s Electronic Case Filing system, a public version of the factual return nom which the information that was highlighted in the proposed public version submitted to the Court has been redacted.

lt is SO ORD]ERED.

Dated: %;//3 m C'

United States District judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Nassim v. Obama, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nassim-v-obama-dcd-2013.