Nasser v. Nasser

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nasser v. Nasser

583 So. 2d 376, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7187, 1991 WL 128316

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 16, 1991

DocketNo. 90-2549

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 583 So. 2d 376 (Nasser v. Nasser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nasser v. Nasser, 583 So. 2d 376, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7187, 1991 WL 128316 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Stephen M. Nasser (husband), appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage granting appellee, Janice A. Nasser (wife), permanent and rehabilitative alimony, child support, attorneys’ fees, and requiring the husband to maintain two insurance policies as security for the alimony and child support payments. We affirm in part, and reverse in part.

We find that the trial court acted within its discretion in awarding the wife permanent alimony and attorneys’ fees, and requiring the husband to maintain two insurance policies as security for alimony and child support payments. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Sobelman v. Sobelman, 541 So.2d 1153 (Fla.1989). We find, however, that the trial court erred in failing to provide that the permanent alimony payments should terminate upon the death of either party. Gold v. Gold, 417 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d at 1202. Accordingly, we affirm in part, and reverse in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Stephen M. Nasser (husband), appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage granting appellee, Janice A. Nasser (wife), permanent and rehabilitative alimony, child support, attorneys’ fees, and requiring the husband to maintain two insurance policies as security for the alimony and child support payments. We affirm in part, and reverse in part.

We find that the trial court acted within its discretion in awarding the wife permanent alimony and attorneys’ fees, and requiring the husband to maintain two insurance policies as security for alimony and child support payments. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Sobelman v. Sobelman, 541 So.2d 1153 (Fla.1989). We find, however, that the trial court erred in failing to provide that the permanent alimony payments should terminate upon the death of either party. Gold v. Gold, 417 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d at 1202. Accordingly, we affirm in part, and reverse in part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

583 So. 2d 376, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7187, 1991 WL 128316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nasser-v-nasser-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack