Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Nassau Suffolk Lumber & Supply Corp. v. Electrograph Technologies Corp.

Nassau Suffolk Lumber & Supply Corp. v. Electrograph Technologies Corp.

91 A.D.3d 920, 937 N.Y.2d 598
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 31, 2012
StatusPublished

This text of 91 A.D.3d 920 (Nassau Suffolk Lumber & Supply Corp. v. Electrograph Technologies Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nassau Suffolk Lumber & Supply Corp. v. Electrograph Technologies Corp., 91 A.D.3d 920, 937 N.Y.2d 598 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

The defendant failed to demonstrate that it had a potentially meritorious defense to the action on the issue of liability for breach of the commercial lease (see generally Holy Props. v Cole Prods., 87 NY2d 130, 133-134 [1995]; Riverside Research Inst. v KMGA, Inc., 68 NY2d 689, 691-692 [1986]; REP A8 LLC v Aventura Tech., Inc., 68 AD3d 1087, 1089 [2009]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion to vacate the default judgment. Dillon, J.E, Balkin, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holy Properties Ltd. v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.
661 N.E.2d 694 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Riverside Research Institute v. KMGA, Inc.
497 N.E.2d 669 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
REP A8 LLC v. Aventura Technologies, Inc.
68 A.D.3d 1087 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 A.D.3d 920, 937 N.Y.2d 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nassau-suffolk-lumber-supply-corp-v-electrograph-technologies-corp-nyappdiv-2012.